All case studies

Technical SEO

Consolidating a sprawling location-page structure for Everything IT

A managed IT services provider was competing with itself. Three near-identical URLs targeted the same cities, none of them ranked, and the copy was the same page with the city name swapped. We cut the location pages to the four regions that actually matter and put the rest on 301s.

everythingit.ie

Client
Everything IT — managed IT services, Dublin
Work
Technical SEO, information architecture, content
Measured
1–27 July 2026 vs 1–27 August 2026
Source
Google Search Console
Everything IT
Everything IT homepage showing the Dublin IT support positioning and service navigation

Location pages that had accumulated rather than been planned

The site had accumulated location pages the way most sites accumulate them: gradually, by different people, with no plan. Multiple URLs targeted the same city — `/cork/`, `/it-support-cork/` and `/it-support-cork-2/` all existed simultaneously. The copy across them was close to identical with the city name swapped, which is the doorway pattern Google filters rather than rewards.

The pages competed with each other for the same searches, and none of them won.

Four pages, each written for the region it serves

The fix was not more pages. It was fewer, better ones — and a clear decision about which regions Everything IT genuinely has something specific to say about.

  • Cut the location pages down to four. Cork, Galway, Limerick and Waterford — the four regions where Everything IT genuinely has something specific to offer. Everything else was retired and redirected rather than left to dilute the site.
  • Wrote each of the four differently. Not a template with the city swapped. Cork City and County Cork, Galway and the West, Limerick and the Mid-West, Waterford and the South-East each serve a different mix of local businesses, so each page targets the services that actually match its area.
  • Resolved the duplicate URLs. One canonical page per location, with 301s from the retired variants so the accumulated equity moved rather than evaporated.
  • Rebuilt internal linking between the location pages and the location directory, so the four surviving pages inherited the internal authority the retired ones had been splitting.
Google Search Console performance graph comparing the latest three months with the same period last year
Google Search Console, captured 9 September 2026. Solid lines are the latest three months, dotted lines the same period last year.

Clicks up 32%, impressions up 18%, measured four weeks either side

Across the four surviving pages, comparing the month before the work with the month after:

PageClicksImpressionsAverage position
Cork4 → 71,159 → 87645.7 → 34.4
Waterford3 → 31,207 → 69851.6 → 36.2
Limerick7 → 9928 → 2,10117.5 → 27.8
Galway5 → 6899 → 1,27143.5 → 40.4
Combined19 → 254,193 → 4,946—

Clicks to the four pages

19

+32% increase

1–27 July 2026 vs 1–27 August 2026

Impressions, four pages

4,193

+18% increase

4,193 → 4,946

Limerick impressions

928

+126% increase

928 → 2,101, the largest single gain

Limerick average position

17.5

27.8 decrease, unfavourable

Worse — see below. More searches won, at lower positions.

The whole-property Search Console picture

The table above isolates the four location pages changed in this project. The screenshot below is a second, broader view: the client's entire Google Search Console property for the latest three months against the same period last year, as viewed on 9 September 2026.

Because the whole-property view includes more than these four pages, it should not be read as though every gain came from the location-page consolidation.

Two things, stated plainly

A case study that reports only the good half is an advertisement.

Limerick's average position got worse — 17.5 to 27.8 — while its impressions more than doubled. Those two facts are related. The page went from surfacing for a narrow set of searches to surfacing for a much wider set, and the newly-added ones sit lower down. An average dragged down by winning more ground is not the same as a decline, but it looks identical on a dashboard, and any agency reporting on this account should be able to tell you which one you are looking at.

Cork and Waterford both lost impressions even as their positions improved sharply. During a consolidation the retired URLs keep appearing in search results for a while, then stop; the totals dip before they recover. We expected this and said so in advance, which is the only reason it was not alarming when it happened.

Across the whole domain, including every retired URL bleeding its old traffic through a redirect, the same month looked flat. Judged only on the four pages that were actually the subject of the work, it did not. Both numbers are true, and an agency that shows you only the flattering one is choosing which truth to hand you.

Not everything here has a result yet

An AI chat assistant for the site has been built and is running on a staging environment for the client to evaluate before any decision about putting it in front of real visitors.

It is mentioned here because it is part of the engagement, not because there is a result to report yet. There is not.

Technologies used

  • WordPress
  • Google Search Console
  • 301 redirects
  • Schema.org
  • Internal linking

Want results you can check?

Tell us what you are trying to fix and we will tell you honestly whether we can measure it.

Start a project Call (480) 818-5761

Ready to make
something great together?

We believe in Web development, design & SEO for Arizona businesses — built in Gilbert and we’re ready to join your journey. Reach out to us and let’s start discussing your project.
PopUp Lets Talk

By sending this form, I confirm that I have read and accepted the Privacy Policy.