Most agency case studies are unfalsifiable. A percentage with no baseline, a graph with no axis labels, a client who cannot be contacted to confirm any of it. We would rather publish fewer of them and have each one checkable.
This page has four entries: two client engagements and two products we built ourselves. A case study needs an outcome that can actually be checked and, for client work, permission to name the business. For SEO work, that means measured data. For a new website or software platform, the finished build itself can be inspected while future performance is clearly labeled as still in progress.
Client: Everything IT, a managed IT services provider based in Dublin, serving business clients across Ireland.
Work: Technical SEO, information architecture, content.
Period measured: 1–27 July 2026 against 1–27 August 2026, from Google Search Console.
The site had accumulated location pages the way most sites accumulate them: gradually, by different people, with no plan. Multiple URLs targeted the same city — /cork/, /it-support-cork/ and /it-support-cork-2/ all existed simultaneously. The copy across them was close to identical with the city name swapped, which is the doorway pattern Google filters rather than rewards. The pages competed with each other for the same searches, and none of them won.
Across the four surviving pages, comparing the month before the work with the month after:
| Page | Clicks | Impressions | Average position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cork | 4 → 7 | 1,159 → 876 | 45.7 → 34.4 |
| Waterford | 3 → 3 | 1,207 → 698 | 51.6 → 36.2 |
| Limerick | 7 → 9 | 928 → 2,101 | 17.5 → 27.8 |
| Galway | 5 → 6 | 899 → 1,271 | 43.5 → 40.4 |
| Combined | 19 → 25 | 4,193 → 4,946 | — |
Clicks to the four pages rose 32% and impressions 18%. On individual commercial searches, the page-one movement is the part that matters more than the totals: business IT support Waterford averaged position 2.5, IT services Limerick around 5, IT support Limerick around 7, and network specialists Cork 9.5.
The page-level table above isolates the four location pages changed in this project. The screenshot below is a second, broader view: the client’s entire Google Search Console property for the latest three months against the same period last year, as viewed on September 9, 2026. Because the whole-property view includes more than these four pages, it should not be read as though every gain came from the location-page consolidation.

Evidence dated September 9, 2026. We will update this case study as newer reporting periods become available.
Two things, stated plainly because a case study that reports only the good half is an advertisement.
Limerick’s average position got worse — 17.5 to 27.8 — while its impressions more than doubled. Those two facts are related. The page went from surfacing for a narrow set of searches to surfacing for a much wider set, and the newly-added ones sit lower down. An average dragged down by winning more ground is not the same as a decline, but it looks identical on a dashboard, and any agency reporting on this account should be able to tell you which one you are looking at.
Cork and Waterford both lost impressions even as their positions improved sharply. During a consolidation the retired URLs keep appearing in search results for a while, then stop; the totals dip before they recover. We expected this and said so in advance, which is the only reason it was not alarming when it happened.
Across the whole domain, including every retired URL bleeding its old traffic through a redirect, the same month looked flat. Judged only on the four pages that were actually the subject of the work, it did not. Both numbers are true, and an agency that shows you only the flattering one is choosing which truth to hand you.
An AI chat assistant for the site has been built and is running on a staging environment for the client to evaluate before any decision about putting it in front of real visitors. It is mentioned here because it is part of the engagement, not because there is a result to report yet. There is not.
Client: Prestige Windows, an Arizona window and door company.
Work: Website strategy, visual design, user experience, WordPress development, content structure and lead capture.
Build launched: May 2026.
SEO phase: Began September 9, 2026. The baseline and measured results will be added here as the data matures.
Website: prestigewindowsaz.com
This was a ground-up website project, not a redesign of an existing Prestige Windows site. The job was to turn a premium window and door offering into a clear digital experience: establish the visual direction, organize a broad product range, help homeowners understand their options and give them straightforward ways to request a quote or consultation.

The result at this stage is the working website itself. It is live, publicly inspectable and gives prospective customers clear routes from initial product research to a consultation or quote request. That is a website-build outcome; it is not being presented as proof of an SEO increase.
The search campaign begins with a dated baseline before conclusions are drawn. Future updates will report Google Search Console clicks, impressions, click-through rate, average position and landing-page movement, together with GA4 engagement and lead data where attribution is reliable. No traffic or ranking lift is claimed here today because the measurement period has only just begun.
As the campaign matures, this section will be updated with the comparison window, the actual reporting screenshots and what did or did not move. The website-build record will stay separate from the SEO record so one is never used as evidence for the other.
Product: AZWebCorp’s in-house SEO reporting platform.
Work: Product strategy, interface design, full-stack development, Google data integrations and client-specific access.
Technology: React 19, TypeScript, Vite, Cloudflare Workers, Cloudflare D1, Drizzle ORM, Recharts, Google Search Console and Google Analytics 4.
Snapshot date: September 9, 2026.
SEO reporting is usually scattered across separate products, emailed spreadsheets and occasional screenshots. A client may know that work is happening without having a simple place to see what changed, where traffic came from, which pages are moving and what deserves attention next.
The portal gives each client a private workspace that brings the reporting layers together under one roof. The dashboard opens with the current signal rather than a wall of raw exports, then lets the client move into the detail when they need it.

Clients no longer have to translate a collection of disconnected reports into a picture of performance. They can sign in, see the current executive signal, inspect the supporting Search Console and Analytics data, and move from the overview into the specific area they care about. It makes ongoing SEO work easier to understand without pretending that every useful detail belongs on the first screen.
This case study documents the platform that was built. Adoption, reporting use and future feature changes will be added only when there is enough evidence to describe them accurately.
Product: AZWebCorp’s public SEO audit tool.
Work: Audit methodology, interface design, WordPress plugin development, live crawling, report generation and Google performance-data integration.
Technology: WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, WordPress REST API, DOM parsing and Google PageSpeed Insights.
Availability: Open to anyone at azwebcorp.com/seo.
Snapshot date: September 9, 2026.
Many website audits are either a short sales form that hides the useful information or a dense technical export that leaves the owner to interpret it alone. A business should be able to test a public website, see what was actually checked and understand which findings deserve attention before committing to a sales conversation.

The result is a working public product: anyone can visit azwebcorp.com/seo, test a public website and move from a high-level score into the evidence behind it. The audit makes technical findings easier to discuss because the visitor and the agency can begin with the same dated report.
This case study documents the tool that was built. A report score describes the website scanned at that moment; it is not a claim that running the audit by itself improves rankings, traffic or revenue.
Other work is underway — website builds and search work for clients in Arizona and elsewhere. It is not on this page because the work cannot yet be independently checked or the client has not agreed to be named, and we are not going to assume.
That is a slower way to build a portfolio page. It is also the reason the four entries above can be checked line by line.
Because we only publish work where the client agreed to be named and where there is a checkable outcome to report. SEO engagements that are too new to have produced data are not described as though they already produced results.
Yes. Everything IT is in Ireland and the work was delivered from Gilbert, Arizona. Technical SEO, content and reporting do not require the agency to be in the same country. Where physical presence genuinely matters, such as photography or in-person meetings, we say so before the engagement starts.
Only if you tell us we can. Nothing is published about your account without your explicit agreement, and you can withdraw that at any point and we will take it down.
No. One engagement is not a forecast for another. Different market, different competition, different starting point. Anyone guaranteeing a specific position is either inexperienced or not being straight with you.
If you want to see something closer to your own situation, ask. There is work we cannot put on a public page but can walk you through on a call, and we can usually put you in touch with the client directly.
Call (480) 818-5761 or email info@azwebcorp.com.